Copyright (C) 2006 Jeremy Stride
We return to this formation of 2001:
This formation shows a side view of the magnetic rings. Below, the 3 primary magnetic rings are marked as MR1, MR2, and MR3. The hydrogen pools which are related to MR1 and MR3 are marked as P1 and P3.
The hydrogen content of P1 and P3 is referenced symbolically in early formations such as this next design from 1994, remember the two small dots represent hydrogen, here we see hydrogen in MR1 and MR3, referencing the hydrogen pools which are also seen above:
Moving into new ground, we can see the clear link when we compare this new formation, the hydrogen pools are also represented, we know this is also a side view:
Confirmation:
This is especially useful because it helps us find out the placement of other objects in the complex watersphere.
Here is an image looking down at the magnetic rings from the top:
And here is one from the side, notice I have added the mystery objects which will now be examined (marked as X):
This formation was modified over several nights:
Stage 1:
Stage 2:
Stage 3:
These diagrams make it clear:
Note that in the Stage 3 diagram above, the shaded area represents the modifications to the formation.
Above, the object
d1 is a either water or a hydrogen atom (not 100% sure, but probably water). As a result of processes inside the core of the watersphere, this object is modified, with the result being
d2.
Note: The second object
d2 is definately water.
The change is shown graphically as the amount of space around it getting larger.
This is a clue to the change that has occurred.
d2 is enlarged below. Notice how the new ring is more clearly defined thanks to a thin circle of crop which has been left standing.
The formation below shows the same design of water:
Objects
a and
b appear to be the same type of thing. Notice how objects
b however were added seperately with
c at the same time the hydrogen atom
d is enlarged.
Notice how
d1 becomes
d2 at the same time
b and
c appear. I expect
c represents an area of water which has recently been created as a result of
hydrogen and
oxygen.
Objects
b are interesting in their connection to water. Considering that they appear at the same time as
d2 is formed, they appear to have a connection. Additionally, the following formation from 2006 appears to have grouped bunches of crops in objects
b which almost look like they are
wet, or have been soaked with water:
I have wondered if objects
a and
b the same, and perhaps are indicated simply to have moved position. This is a possibility, however I think the large amount of celtic cross formations showing all four circles at the one time rule this out.
I have added additional elements to this image:
Remember that the magnetic rings which are drawn in purple above rotate and also in part move within modified hydrogen which has come from the pyramid. The rotation of the magnetic rings can be recognized
from above in the following formation. I believe the
three fold nature of the magnetic rings is important, and perhaps also a necessary feature in relation to its interaction with the
six fold electrical structures beneath the watersphere which we will see in a moment.
Additionally, we know that objects
a and
b produce a magnetic field as a result of two formations in 2006.
For example, this formation displays three magnetic fields:
On the very same day in July of 2006, this formation also appeared:
Therefore, we can consider the following style of magnetism. Notice how the two smaller magnets in this case are aligned the same way, which the large center object is opposite. This is reflected in the magnetic field formation below on the right.
We can consider how this may fit into our model. The area shown with a question mark below then, can be estimated to be the bulk of the inner watersphere which contains the pyramid and magnetic rings. (Ahah... magnetic rings, yes, magnetic indeed.)
We can assume then that the objects
a and
b interact with the magnetic rings. Perhaps also the hydrogen pools around the magnetic rings are also relevant - I can't really comment on that.
This also makes sense as we can see how objects
b are in line with the magnetic rings from a side view, two examples follow:
So, we know objects
a and
b have a relationship to magnetism and water. As always, the clues we need are available for us to learn more.
Comments on this page
No visitor messages have been posted yet for this crop circle.
|
